Agree on not losing default ones
Marie, I think this would be okay if it was an option, not an automatic thing. The singles glossary can be pretty nice once you have it edited as you like and are used to it; it would be a shame to have to "use" a different one for each glossary. I fully agree. To satisfy Jude's requirement without "throwing the baby with the bath water" would require adding another section to glossaries. For example, it could look like: [Singles] a Another one this doctor likes
These singles would have precedence over the default ones. So I think it is possible to do it. On the other hand we are not going to add something in the future just because it is possible to do it because it makes the product more complex to build, maintain, and learn :-) So it is an interesting suggestion but sofar not yet a compelling one. Jean Ichbiah
| ||||||||||