No limit to glossary includes
Rennie, I am not aware of any limit. If you were to encounter one, we would look at it. I am curious about the reason for having that many includes. I assume they must be small glossaries and there is a methodology justifying the number of glossaries. Note also that you can have includes within includes like in: Top level Aglossary A1Top level B Jean Ichbiah
| ||||||||||||