Several contenders submitted entries with more than one method and the results they obtained are shown below.
Kevin Huang
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
Treo Thumboard
31.09s
77.19
Kevin Huang
FitalyStamp
37.53s
63.94
Kevin Huang
Patrick Yam
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
FitalyStamp
32.63s
73.55
Patrick Yam
Atomik Palm
33.55s
71.53
Patrick Yam
MessagEaseST
50.32s
47.69
Patrick Yam
Richard Owens
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
Fitaly PPC
39.05s
61.45
Richard Owens
SPB PPC thumboard
48.86s
49.12
Richard Owens
Qwerty PPC
69.94s
34.31
Richard Owens
Transcriber PPC
108.18s
22.19
Richard Owens
Palmsolo
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
Fitaly PPC
39.59s
60.62
Palmsolo
MessagEaseST
96.12s
24.96
Palmsolo
Will Lau
Walter Mitty
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
Fitaly Palm
46.07s
52.09
Will Lau
Treo Thumboard
46.75s
51.33
Will Lau
Method
Time
WPM
Participant
Fitaly PPC
61.57s
38.98
Walter Mitty
Block Recognizer
105.19s
22.81
Walter Mitty
Qwerty PPC
86.41s
27.77
Walter Mitty
Calligrapher
99.24s
24.18
Walter Mitty
It is difficult to derive any conclusion on comparing method from these few examples. Some of the differences may reflect the relative speeds of methods. On the other hand, they may also reflect different degrees of familiarity with the methods.
Dom Perignon IV Contest Dom Perignon III Contest Dom Perignon II Contest Dom Perignon I Contest |
Dom Perignon IV Forum Dom Perignon III Forum Dom Perignon II Forum Hall of Fame |
Statistics By Method IV Statistics By Method III |
Quadratlon Corner IV Quadratlon Corner III |
FitalyStamp Overview FitalyVirtual Overview Fitaly for the Pocket PC Overview |
FitalyLetris for the Palm FitalyLetris for the Pocket PC Textware Solutions |