Not surprising

Re: Repeat multiple compilations using different settings -- Jon Knowles
Posted by Jean Ichbiah ^Ž , Mon, Nov 03, 2003, 11:11:23	Reply	Top	Forum

I compiled Dr. Repetto's folder using a word frequency of 6 and maximum words per phrase of 10. Then I compiled the same folder again using a word frequency of 2 and a MWPP of 5. Then I Included both glossaries in Dr. Repeto's shell glossary, putting the 2 5 glossary above the 6 10 one.

Am I missing something? It should not be a surprise that a word frequency of 2 should yield more phrases than a frequency of 6.

On the other hand, I am intrigued by the idea of combining the 2,5 glossary with a 6,10 glossary. My guess is that it should produce the same thing as a 2,10 glossary: A glossary compiled with a minimum word frequency of 2 and a maximum words per phrase of 10. Have you tried it?

Jean Ichbiah

Followups

Different results from the 2 methods -- Jon Knowles Nov 03
- What about Clauses? -- Jean Ichbiah Nov 04
  - More on the short and long compilation method and clauses -- Jon Knowles Nov 04
    - Explanations -- Jean Ichbiah Nov 04
      - Naturally, I want to try this! -- LB Nov 05
        
        Summary of the repeat compilation method -- Jon Knowles Nov 06
        
        Wow, thank you for the details, Jon! -- LB Nov 06
        
        Here's the difference in the 3-5 and 6-9 for me -- LB Nov 06
        
        Now combine 3-5 and 6-9 -- Jean Ichbiah Nov 06
        
        Right, how could I forget that, LOL! -- LB Nov 06