Several contenders submitted entries with more than one input method. The results they obtained are shown below.
Hendrik Christian
Method Time WPM Participant
Fitaly PPC 31.58 75.99 Hendrik Christian
CalliGrapher PPC 47.18 50.87 Hendrik Christian
Qwerty PPC 54.53 44.01 Hendrik Christian
Decuma PPC 57.91 41.44 Hendrik Christian
Jim Belich
Method Time WPM Participant
FitalyVirtual T3 29.67 80.88 Jim Belich
QwertyVirtual T3 68.62 34.97 Jim Belich
Graffiti 2 T3 83.14 28.86 Jim Belich
Patrick Yam
Method Time WPM Participant
FitalyVirtual T3 32.74 73.30 Patrick Yam
MessagEase T3 47.15 50.90 Patrick Yam
Qwerty Palm T3 56.45 42.51 Patrick Yam
Steve Isenberg
Method Time WPM Participant
FitalyVirtual TH55 67.89 35.35 Steve Isenberg
Graffiti 76.95 31.18 Steve Isenberg
MessagEase NX 85.67 28.01 Steve Isenberg
Jaren Waldner
Method Time WPM Participant
Fitaly PPC 32.17 74.60 Jaren Waldner
Qwerty PPC 38.60 62.17 Jaren Waldner
Zoltan Heizler
Method Time WPM Participant
FitalyVirtual NX 33.68 71.25 Zoltan Heizler
Qwerty Palm 58.58 40.96 Zoltan Heizler
Palmsolo
Method Time WPM Participant
Fitaly PPC 46.93 51.13 Palmsolo
MessagEase PPC 63.45 37.82 Palmsolo
It is difficult to derive any conclusion on comparing method from these few examples. Some of the differences may reflect the relative speeds of methods. On the other hand, they may also reflect different degrees of familiarity with the methods.
Dom Perignon IV Contest Dom Perignon III Contest Dom Perignon II Contest Dom Perignon I Contest |
Dom Perignon IV Forum Dom Perignon III Forum Dom Perignon II Forum Hall of Fame |
Statistics By Method IV Statistics By Method III |
Quadratlon Corner IV Quadratlon Corner III |
FitalyStamp Overview FitalyVirtual Overview Fitaly for the Pocket PC Overview |
FitalyLetris for the Palm FitalyLetris for the Pocket PC Textware Solutions |